ABSTRACT
@#<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Background:</strong> A well-informed patient with Type 2 diabetes may be more compliant with treatment. This study aims to evaluate the diabetes-related knowledge and socio demographic determinants of patients seen at University of Santo Tomas Hospital through a translated and validated Filipino-DKT questionnaire.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods:</strong> Standard translation procedure was used to produce the Filipino version of the DKT2. A convenience sample of 112 outpatients with Type 2 diabetes was identified for six months at the University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Philippines. All data were collected using the Filipino-DKT and a demographic questionnaire.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results:</strong> The Filipino-DKT demonstrated an acceptable Cronbach's alpha of 0.70 and an acceptable average inter-item correlation of 0.40 (p<0.001). The test-retest reliability was excellent, with a Pearson coefficient r of 1.00 (p<0.001). Our study demonstrated that of the 112 patients with diabetes who answered the general knowledge test, the majority had average knowledge of 78.64%, while 16.07% had poor knowledge. A total of 55 participants on insulin answered the second part of Filipino-DKT that measures insulin knowledge. Surprisingly, 56% of the subjects on insulin had poor knowledge, and only 7% had good knowledge. Results showed that the majority (56%) had poor knowledge. Participants who reported poor control of their diabetes (HbA1c >7%) also reported lower levels of knowledge about diabetes and insulin use. There was no association between duration of diabetes, family history of diabetes, and type of diabetes with knowledge of diabetes.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The Filipino diabetic knowledge of diabetes is poor and not related to age, sex, and duration of diabetes. Filipino-DKT is an acceptable, reliable, and valid measure of diabetes knowledge used in our clinical practice and research.</p>
ABSTRACT
@#Background & Objective: Chronic pain impacts the quality of life of patients, with neuropathic pain causing profound negative sequelae. Assessment of pain whether nociceptive or neuropathic is important to provide appropriate treatment. The objective of this study is to translate and validate the pain-DETECT Questionnaire (PDQ) to two widely spoken regional languages in Filipino. Methods: The PDQ, a self-administered questionnaire, was translated from English into the Filipino version, painDETECT Tagalog (PDQ-Tag) and painDETECT Cebuano (PDQ-Ceb). One hundred Filipino patients suffering from pain for at least three months were recruited in the out-patient clinics of a hospital and completed the questionnaire. The investigators, blinded to the subjects PDQ-Tag and PDQ-Ceb scores, examined the subjects using the standard clinical and neurological examination. The PDQ-Tag and PDQ-Ceb, scores were validated. Both questionnaires were administered to the same patient twice, two days apart by the same investigator. Results: Seventy subjects completed the (PDQ-Tag) and thirty subjects the (PDQ-Ceb). The sensitivity and specificity of PDQ-Tag were both 80% for an upper limit cut-off value of ≥ 17. The sensitivity and specificity of PDQ-Ceb were 62.5% and 80% respectively, for an upper limit cut-off value ≥ 18.0. Both questionnaires were reliable [Cronbach’s alpha coefficient: 0.78 (PDQ-Tag) and 0.70 (PDQ-Ceb), good test-retest stability with intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.93 for PDQ-Tag and 0.99 for PDQ-Ceb]. Cohen’s kappa were 0.64 and 0.61 for PDQ-Ceb and PDQ-Tag respectively, with P value<0.001 indicating a significant agreement on the assessment of neuropathic pain. Conclusion: PDQ-Tag and PDQ-Ceb are reliable and valid self-administered screening tools to detect neuropathic pain among Filipinos.